![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Bank Systems & Technology: The Blog« July 2006 | Main | September 2006 » Weep or celebrate, but banking technology is in fine shapeAugust 28, 2006 @ 04:21 PM | By Art Gillis By Art Gillis Just two days after I posted last week’s blog here, Mitch Betts, Executive Editor at Computerworld, performed a cerebral correlation and concluded that another article sounded familiar. In her recent story, a CW reporter called banking IT “boring.” I had called it “dull.” Did someone commit plagiarism? Did we collaborate? I couldn’t even tell you the reporter’s name. And unlike reporters covering Iraq where there is one main event, technology has at least thousands of events to cover. So just maybe there is some truth in our view that banking technology is perhaps leveling off. If you’re a vendor of bank tech solutions, you’re ready for rehab. When you come out, you’ll feel like you’re 30, you’re hungry, you want a net worth that will go from zero million to 60 million in five years and you think the year is 2011. My sympathies are with the vendors. In truth, technology is not over. Tech vendors just don’t know where the gold is and instead of pick and shovel, they’re carrying a sack full of products that by now are really stale. The new game in town is how to make the folks at the workstations of banks more effective. You figure out the rest while you’re away. Comments(4)CIO 2006: JPMorgan’s Michael Ashworth Proves There’s No ‘I’ In Team August 24, 2006 @ 11:36 PM | By Vitali Zhulkovsky By Maria Bruno-Britz
Michael Ashworth, Managing Director & CIO, Investment Bank, JPMorgan JPMorgan’s investment bank managing director & CIO, Michael Ashworth, discusses how technological flexibility and agility has allowed the $1.3 trillion financial institution to weather significant acquisitions and ultimately come out on top at the end. He also relates the importance of leveraging existing technology infrastructure across the enterprise to get a leg up on the competition. Comment on this blog entryCIO 2006: MetLife Bank’s Mark La Penta Makes His Mark As the New Kid on the Block August 24, 2006 @ 11:33 PM | By Vitali Zhulkovsky By Nancy Feig
Mark La Penta, CTO and COO for Insurance giant MetLife’s new bank, talks about his role in MetLife Bank’s quick success. He also speaks of the role “strategic incrementalism” will play in the future of financial services IT. Comment on this blog entryCIO 2006: First Horizon’s Patrick Ruckh Creates a Unified Front for Success August 24, 2006 @ 11:27 PM | By Vitali Zhulkovsky By Maria Bruno-Britz
Patrick Ruckh, EVP & CIO, First Horizon First Horizon EVP & CIO Patrick Ruckh talks to BS&T about the role IT plays in enabling others at the bank to better serve the customers. He also reflects on First Horizon’s runaway success in the remote deposit capture space, along with how he thinks the future of U.S. banking will be shaped by mobile and self-service technology. CIO 2006: Mellon's Kevin Shearan Takes People Power Seriously August 24, 2006 @ 11:24 PM | By Vitali Zhulkovsky By Maria Bruno-Britz
Kevin L. Shearan, EVP & CIO, Mellon Financial As Kevin Shearan, EVP & CIO with Mellon Financial, nears his one-year anniversary as the top technology executive at the Pittsburgh-based financial services firm, he shares with BS&T his reflections on transitioning to such a key role. He also talks about the growing importance of market confidence and client integrity in a security-conscious world. Comment on this blog entryCIO 2006: Deleware County Bank & Trust’s Brian Stanfill Lives and Works With a Sense of Adventure August 24, 2006 @ 11:14 PM | By Vitali Zhulkovsky By Nancy Feig
Brian Stanfill, SVP of operations at Delaware County Bank & Trust, brings his love for challenges to his IT department. In this podcast, Stanfill discusses his key project at Delaware County, “Smart Deposit Solutions,” which takes advantage of Check 21 legislation. Stanfill also speaks to the values that guide his life and his business philosophy. Comment on this blog entryCIO 2006: Bank of New York’s Kurt Woetzel Manufactures IT Success August 24, 2006 @ 04:19 PM | By Vitali Zhulkovsky By Maria Bruno-Britz
Kurt D. Woetzel, CIO & Senior Executive Vice President, The Bank of New York For Kurt Woetzel, CIO & senior EVP with The Bank of New York, financial services IT is a dynamic being, and the only way to stay ahead of the curve is to constantly adapt. He explains how technology is exposing banks even more to their customers, further emphasizing the import of taking a proactive stance to IT within the organization. Comments(1) This Is a Pretty Dull Time for Bank Technology August 21, 2006 @ 09:59 AM | By Art Gillis By Art Gillis '70s
'80s
'90s
Early '00s
Today
In my opinion, until new solutions appear, buying sprees will occur when tech companies buy tech companies. The only organic thing these companies will see is what’s in a Whole Foods store. This negative outlook might change if solutions providers could figure out how to make their customers more competitive than another vendor’s customers. They’re all selling commodities that after 40 years have become a bit stale. Can I interest you in a bushel of Grade AAA corn (a.k.a. my DDA system)? Comment on this blog entryEight vendors failed: Criminal intent? I don’t think so. Stupidity? Lots of it. August 14, 2006 @ 09:38 AM | By Art Gillis By Art Gillis This is the third blog in a series of things bankers should know as they search for a new core system. The following events occurred in the '80s and '90s when a slick-Willie salesman could convince a banker that a dead pigeon under a mixing bowl was really pheasant under glass. The good news is that most snake oil salesmen and scam vendors are gone now. Pay attention to the word “most.” 1. A core system startup had two good things going for it. It’s name, USA, and its location, Orlando. The thing it didn’t have was software. But it still got bankers to sign contracts. Reality and shock set in very quickly. Software development and implementation should not occur simultaneously. Twenty-three bankers gave new meaning to the horrors of a conversion. 2. A bankruptcy court in Colorado held an auction to get some money from a defunct bank software company. A tech company in Charlotte liked what it saw and was delighted when its bid of a cool $1 million won the contest. The demo screens were impressive enough to convince six Georgia banks to sign contracts. The only problem was there was no coding behind the screens. Except for a few red faces, and some red ink, the situation ended peacefully. The Charlotte company returned all deposits with apologies and returned to its Trust Accounting business, having gained an entirely new understanding of the word “trust.” 3. Houston must be the capital for CPA firm irregularities as was observed in the Enron failure. Another Big Eight firm’s experience in their Houston office was not so global and disastrous. They were recommending the same core software company to all their bank clients, but realized they were leaving a lot of revenue on the table after their “selection study” was completed. So they acquired the software company and continued to recommend it while looking forward to picking up license and implementation fees. But implementing software required a whole set of different talents that the CPA firm didn’t have. The firm quietly closed the operation, “sold” the software company back to its original owner, and went back to counting beans. 4. A startup software company made its first appearance in all the bank trade journals with full-page ads. The exposure worked. Soon everyone was talking about the company. I had trouble figuring out what ducks on a pond had to do with bank software, but ads don’t do much for me anyway. The company’s sales approach was to bash the then mid-range-based hardware systems by promising one PC was all that a bank needed to process its work. The company failed, but a prominent systems integration company acquired the product as their entry into banking. That failed and they dumped the system onto a small bank service bureau. That didn’t work either. If at first you don’t succeed......... 5. Systems from Nigeria probably won’t play in Peoria and a few other heartland locations where the bulk of independent banks reside. But one very popular banking company decided to pour millions into the americanization of a client/server system only to find out, after five years, it didn’t work. 6, 7 & 8. Motives play an important part in failures. Three startups entered the bank core marketplace, not because they had a better “mousetrap,” which I believe is the most noble reason to start a business, but because they had selfish reasons. One company owned a relational database management system and wanted to sell it to banks. It dug up a core system, “glued” it to the RDBMS and tried to sell it. But bankers don’t buy database systems to process banking transactions, and they don’t buy dead banking systems. Another company entered the business by way of chest-beating and press releases. It was the shortest lived company ever - six months. A third company wanted to be different. In the Banking Club of America, different is like missing three loan payments in a row. The company failed twice. Once when the vendor bellied up, and second, when the customers, who took over the company and did their own thing for a while, abandoned it. Be careful, folks. It’s safer these days, but the challenge is to select the “most right system” for your bank and second choice will come back to haunt you sometime within eighteen months after the conversion. Comment on this blog entryThe first mistake in searching for a new core system - Finding the best system August 07, 2006 @ 09:58 AM | By Art Gillis By Art Gillis Trying to find the best system is indeed a mistake. Best system according to whom? Is the best system for Citibank the best system for a de novo? Is the best system in California the best system in Maine? Don’t be too quick to answer that one. The answer may be yes. Is the system with the largest number of users the best system? Every bank deserves the best fit, not the best system. And the process begins with what I call, “Know thyself.” There are 71 marketable core solutions available in the U.S. marketplace. The list consists of solutions for commercial banks, thrifts and credit unions. Some solutions operate as in-house mode only, outsource mode only, and both-ways mode. A few operate in the large banks arena only, and many operate very well for small and mid-tier banks (de novo to banks with a few billion dollars in assets). Some solutions are so good that the competitors of the solution’s creator use it to drive their own business. Some solutions are not so great, but other vendors want to drive them for banks that outsource. A license to run the Hogan System is like having first draft picks on Ted Williams, should he ever come alive from his cryogenic state. Some solutions are used by thousands of banks; others are used by less than 50. Some vendors own as many as 18 core solutions; others own just one. Some solutions are locked into one hardware platform; others will run on several. It’s like the auto industry. There’s a right car for everyone, and it’s not the Bentley. Take the time to examine the bank and maybe a dozen of the 71. When you come up with the right FIT, then you’ll know you made the right choice. In-the-lab assessments of the “best” system can be left to marketing departments, salesmen and research firms. Comments(2) |
|
|
|
|
||